Sir, you are right, my site is new and in the process of growing. And I did take offense to what you said as I have always been one of integrity and honor. And in your defense your right, you don't know me from Adam, however, you are the one that "attacked" me with your statement and I responded as I honestly felt and saw fit. You are right, you can chose whom you add to your site or not, as do I. You are right, you do not need my link, and nor do I. And if from my three emails they tell you a lot of my "personality" then the exact same could be said about you. Did I take what you said to "heart" because of your attack upon me? Yes, I did, are you taking to heart what I said about your site to heart? Yes you are. That just goes to show that we are both passionate about what we believe in.
I have 29 years in with ONE international organization and have experience in many others. Unlike you. However, I did not contact you and say, "Your web site is wrong and has a lot of misinformation" I politely asked to be linked to your site, your response was that I was a "certificate mill" and that you would not link me to your site. Which is totally your choice, yet you receive another email after I asked for a reply and you responded to him almost immediately, yet you claim you were busy and could not respond to me. So if you knew what I knew about that, would you not be upset that you were "ignoring" me and "responding" him? Of course you would!